This information note was prepared to share the Scampis MSC experience during an international event (Bangkog 3-7 December 2012). It gives a general idea of why and how MSC has been readapted for the Scampis needs and gives share the practical experience of Scampis India who implemented the methodology (May - October 2012). References to the Guatemala experiences and to the media material (videos, photos) are also available within the document.
Integrated strategies for scaling up micro-irrigation in Guatemala, India and Madagascar
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Guatemala MSC. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Guatemala MSC. Mostra tutti i post
martedì 4 dicembre 2012
Scampis MSC - Information Note for KM/KS writeshop (Bangkok 3-7/12/2012)
Labels:
analysis,
data,
event,
Guatemala MSC,
India MSC,
MSC,
presentation,
qualitative,
training
lunedì 5 novembre 2012
Scampis MSC Analysis - findings
Below you can find synthesis of the MSC analysis made on 3 levels:
- Field staff level
- National level
- Cross country level (India --> Guatemala & Guatemala --> India)
The various analysis have been coded and compared. The images below show the main MSC identified during the analysis process (6 for each country).
- Field staff level
- National level
- Cross country level (India --> Guatemala & Guatemala --> India)
The various analysis have been coded and compared. The images below show the main MSC identified during the analysis process (6 for each country).
Labels:
analysis,
cross-country,
Guatemala MSC,
India MSC,
MSC
martedì 9 ottobre 2012
Don Vincente Most Significant Change (Abstracts)
...Abstracts from Most significant Change interview. Download the entire interview txt
2nd Interviewer:
Do you cultivate vegetables? 3rd User: Yes, as you can see we
have vegetables here (the other user asks: before Scampi?) no, before Scampi no,
this program has helped us a lot in the strengthening of our community because
before we had so many weaknesses because some people said that they wanted to
quit because it is a hard job, it has helped our vegetables and plants to be
more nutritive for all the things we put in them, because they work different
in our system comparing them to meat which takes a longer process inside our
body so I prefer the vegetables, and for me it would be better to continue
cultivating more vegetables and I hope this group continues to do so because
sometimes it is hard but we have to keep working to reach a better development
as farmers.
2nd Interviewer:
How is the work organized in the group in this farm? (He repeated the
question) 3rd User: We are organized in 5
people who know the place, we studied the land because it had a yellow color
and did not produce anything but thanks to the effort of the group we prepared
the land, fertilized the ground, put manure of cattle, hens and other types, we
strained the soil to have different types for example the prepared soil called
this way because it has been strained and mixed with cattle manure it also has fish
bones and egg shells and ashes all very good mixed and we put them in bags all
the manure which we always use, each time the group come to water the land each
person brings their own manure and put them little by little in the ground
after being strained and we also tell the people to bring bones so we grind
them and have better results in the nutrition of the plant because we have
better harvest in this case bigger radishes.
2nd Interviewer:
Was it difficult to organize the group in the beginning? 3rd User: Yes, it was difficult
because we had to face several weaknesses because some people wanted and other
did not want to be part because some thought it was too much work, and for that
reason communities like ours have many difficulties among the people because
they don’t always like to work and for us that is a problem because the ones
who want to improve and fight like us against our worse poverty which for me is
the mental poverty the one we have to fight because it is hard for us because
we are not prepared sometimes it is our own fault for our lack of desire to
improve because when opportunities like this come we have to use them and I
would like to invite the entire group to keep working hard because it is the
best way to have a better life.
1st Interviewer:
After Scampis what do you plan to reach in a near future? 3rd User: Well for me if we had
the opportunity for now it is only a dream if we could have a better mechanism
to use water so we do not have to waste it and use it as much as we could and
be able to use it for our harvest because as we can see here the family is
washing things and wasting water and I think that there is a way we can use it
or even having some kind of watering system more advanced to use and even to
commercialize it because right now it is only for consumption and with that
system we could have a better result that is a dream a better watering system
but who knows if God helps us I believe we can have it if we continue working
hard.
2nd Interviewer:
Thank you so much for your time.
lunedì 7 maggio 2012
Differences between M&E and MSC for the SCAMPIS project
M&E and MSC at
glance for the SCAMPIS project
|
SCAMPIS M&E
|
SCAMPIS Most Significant Change
|
Our strategy in connecting M&E and
MSC
|
Focus on measurement (output and outcome
data; simple and composite indicators)
|
Focus on real life experience
|
Integrate data information to the
stories: each data will have its related quality example for each country
that will provide not only the context but the linkages with the other
indicators. Reading the Scampis M&E will be a “virtual” tour between
people of the 3 countries.
Not only project beneficiaries will be
monitored/evaluated, but as well the partner performance and strategy. Will
be captured the various different effect of the project involvement, there
will not be any ranking of importance, only a categorization per topics.
Thanks to the consolidated multi-sectorial information the analysis will be
an important tool for strategies and organization improvement and renovation.
(at every level: - beneficiaries; field staff; local staff; national
organization; partners organization and international level).
|
|
Closed questions
|
Open question
|
||
Deductive
|
Inductive
|
||
Static
|
Dynamic
|
||
Objectivity is the driver of the
analysis.
|
Subjectivity is the driver of the
analysis.
|
||
Central tendencies (even if
participatory)
|
Decentralized tendencies: unexpected
results
|
||
•
About ‘proving’
Looking of confirmation/not confirmation
of pre-established indicators.
|
•
About learning
Looking for unexpected effects, try to
understand than what caused
|
||
Needed to see if the strategy implement
is efficient or not.
|
Needed for improving and innovate strategies
at various levels
|
||
Possible to see possible outcomes, but
not impacts
|
Help us to pre-view possible impacts of
the project
|
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)
